Today, the European Commission has fined X with β¬120 million for breaching the Digital Services Act.
This is the first ever fine under the DSA.
X has indeed breached its transparency obligations in the following areas:
π X's blue checkmark deceives users. Anyone can pay to obtain the 'verified' status. X does not meaningfully verify who is behind. Users cannot verify the authenticity of the accounts and the content they are engaging with.
π X's ad repository does not work. It obscures information on advertisements, such as who is paying for the ad.
π X is not allowing effective data access for researchers.
This is a proportionate fine. Proportional to the duration, the gravity, the impact and the recurrence of these breaches.
Today, we have also accepted TikTokβs commitments to make its advertising repository work.
We have made these commitments legally binding and will now monitor their effective implementation.
What do these two cases show? Our objective is not a fine.
When platforms engage constructively with the Commission and offer solid commitments, we accept them.
If they do not, we take action.
Because DSA compliance is not an option. Itβs an obligation. And EVP Henna Virkkunen is very serious about enforcement.
More info: ππ»
X: https://lnkd.in/euP-8t6t
TikTok: https://lnkd.in/ezzKHVzF